Why Your AI Product Will Be Obsolete in Six Months (And What To Do About It)

Benn Stancil, writer and co-founder of Mode, joins High Signal to ask some uncomfortable questions about the current AI moment. Is now actually a terrible time to start a company? If the tools you build on today are obsolete in six months, at what point does the head start stop mattering? Is all that context engineering you're doing a waste of time, destined to go the way of Boolean search syntax in the 90s?

Guest

Benn Stancil

Builder, Technologist, Writer

Key Takeaways

Is now a terrible time to start a company?

You are building on today's tools. In six months, those tools will be outdated. A year from now is better than six months from now, because you won't have to engineer these weird systems. If you started a company 18 months ago and built your entire product on GPT-4 and Gemini 2.5, those things feel ancient now. At what point does the head start stop mattering?

Context + prompt engineering will go the way of Boolean search. In the 90s, people learned how to write Google queries with Boolean operators and search syntax. Nobody does that anymore. Google just got better. The same thing will happen with AI: people who over-optimize their exact setup with exact skills and exact commands are wasting their time. In six months, the models will just figure it out. The real skill is getting a feel for the machine.

Technical debt may be self-healing.

The traditional fear of messy code is diminishing because future, smarter models will likely be able to untangle the "jank" produced by today's models. Creating technical debt is a rational trade-off for speed if you assume that the next iteration of Claude or GPT can use your messy code as a literal spec for a clean rewrite.

Messy code is the ultimate spec. What's a better spec than a functioning app that does everything you want, but just does it poorly? If you take a competent engineer and give them infinite time, they can rewrite it pixel for pixel, but better. Future models will be able to do exactly that—use your janky app as a spec and rebuild it clean.

"Cowork" replaces collaboration with fact-dumping.

The future of work isn't humans collaborating; it's humans dumping "facts" into a shared repository for agents to interpret. In this model, the "map" (the AI-generated knowledge base) becomes the territory, and humans communicate by updating the central brain directly rather than interacting with each other.

Intermediation kills the "decorum tax."

A significant portion of professional communication is "social decoration"—politeness and framing that humans find tedious to write. Intermediated systems (turning bullets into emails and back into bullets) allow humans to communicate in "radical transparency" while letting agents handle the social niceties required for organizational harmony.

AI is a power sander, not a chainsaw.

You can use AI to cut a bunch of sloppy boards and make a junky dining set fast. Or you can use it like a power sander: you still have to do all the sanding, but now you have an electric tool instead of doing it by hand. The difference is whether you're optimizing for speed or quality. The people who make a really nice chair will still beat you.

You can read the full transcript here.

LINKS

Ready to unleash your data?

Discover how Delphina can transform your data science.

Book a demo